A new force has entered Washington, shaking up federal bureaucracy: the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Established under President Donald Trump’s directive and run by Elon Musk, DOGE aims to eliminate inefficiencies, reduce government waste, and restructure public spending. The agency’s formation aligns with Trump’s push for a leaner government. However, critics argue that it centralizes too much power in the hands of one individual.
DOGE has quickly become one of the most polarizing government agencies. Supporters hail it as a necessary step toward reducing bloated federal spending, while detractors warn that it prioritizes corporate interests over public welfare. The department’s very name—a nod to Musk’s fondness for the Dogecoin cryptocurrency—sets the tone for an unconventional approach. Musk’s expanding ties with Trump add more controversy, fueling questions about the sustainability of their alliance and the risks if their partnership sours.
Big changes are happening fast, and DOGE is cutting through multiple sections of the US government. Here’s a timeline of DOGE’s most significant updates since its first mention.
Let’s start with the proposal to create DOGE by Trump in November
During a campaign rally in Texas, then-presidential candidate Donald Trump unveiled his proposal to create the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) if reelected. He framed it as a necessary response to what he called “runaway government waste” and promised to cut bureaucratic excess to save taxpayer dollars. Trump criticized existing government structures as inefficient and outdated, emphasizing that DOGE would modernize federal operations. His remarks drew applause from conservative voters and immediate criticism from government unions and watchdog groups, who warned that large-scale cuts could threaten essential services.
Just a week after Trump’s announcement, Representatives Aaron Bean (R-FL) and Pete Sessions (R-TX) launched the Delivering Outstanding Government Efficiency (DOGE) Caucus in the House of Representatives. Their goal was to build legislative support for aggressive cost-cutting measures across federal agencies. The caucus focused on identifying inefficiencies in government spending and developing proposals to reduce wasteful expenditures.
House Oversight Chairman James Comer (R-KY) announced the formation of the Delivering on Government Efficiency Subcommittee. This subcommittee, led by Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), reviewed federal spending programs and recommended cuts. Greene vowed to target “redundant and bloated agencies,” including departments focused on environmental regulations, education, and healthcare administration.
On November 22, 2024, Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA) launched the Senate’s Delivering Outstanding Government Efficiency (DOGE) Caucus. The initiative planned to work with President Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to cut bureaucracy, remove excessive regulations, reduce waste, and restructure agencies. Senator Ernst stressed the urgency of tackling the $36 trillion national debt. She committed to working with President Trump, Elon Musk, and Vivek Ramaswamy to address these challenges.
The inaugural DOGE Caucus meeting took place with over 60 lawmakers in attendance, including three Democrats. The discussions centered on identifying immediate targets for cost-cutting, particularly within the Department of Education and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Lawmakers expressed concerns about inefficiencies and wasteful spending in these departments and explored potential reforms to enhance their effectiveness. The bipartisan participation underscored a shared commitment to addressing government inefficiencies and reducing unnecessary expenditures.
President Trump signed an executive order to create the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). He appointed Elon Musk to lead the department and praised his business success. Trump said Musk’s cost-cutting expertise would help reform the government. DOGE would help eliminate wasteful spending and restructure federal agencies for efficiency. The move marked a key step in the administration’s push for smaller government.
David Lebryk, a senior Treasury Department official, resigned after a dispute with DOGE leadership over proposed payment system reforms. Lebryk, a longtime civil servant, had disagreed with Musk’s aggressive changes to streamline processes. His resignation highlighted the tension between career federal employees and the new administration’s vision for cost-cutting. This departure signaled growing resistance to DOGE’s plans and concerns over its long-term impact on government operations and employee protections.
Federal workers protested outside the Office of Personnel Management. They opposed DOGE’s leadership and its impact on job security. Many feared Musk’s influence would cause job cuts, reduced benefits, and weaker civil servant protections. Protesters demanded transparency and better worker protections. They warned that DOGE’s efficiency goals could push privatization and dismantle essential government programs.
Hundreds of federal employees rallied outside the Treasury Department on February 4, 2025, protesting DOGE’s budget cuts and threats to job protections. Unions warned of lost public sector jobs, benefits, and programs. Workers said DOGE’s plans weakened essential services and put cost-cutting ahead of public welfare. They feared the hardest-hit sectors would suffer the most.
On February 11, 2025, investigations began into Elon Musk’s government contracts following reports that his companies, Tesla and SpaceX, had secured billions in federal funding. Lawmakers questioned whether DOGE’s reforms were designed to benefit Musk’s business empire, raising concerns about conflicts of interest. The investigations sought to determine if Musk’s role in overseeing government efficiency reforms created opportunities to further his own financial interests, undermining public trust in the department’s impartiality and reform agenda.
On February 12, 2025, it was revealed that DOGE’s budget had more than doubled to $14.4 million, raising alarms about its financial priorities. Critics argued that the significant increase contradicted the department’s mission of cutting government spending. While supporters defended the expansion as necessary to fund vital reforms, critics questioned whether the funds were being spent effectively. The budget’s increase fueled concerns that DOGE’s growing influence might be used to justify its existence rather than focusing on genuine cost-saving measures.
Contract cancellations persisted as DOGE aggressively pursues government waste reduction despite facing opposition and various controversies.
A DOGE website update on March 1, 2025, corrected some past mistakes but introduced new inaccuracies. Errors included misreported contract values, multiple-counted cancellations, and incorrect data links.
On March 13, 2025, the US Postal Service (USPS) entered into an agreement with DOGE to address ongoing financial challenges. The plan proposed cutting 10,000 jobs via voluntary early retirement. It also aimed to identify further operational efficiencies. Postmaster General Louis DeJoy highlighted the need for significant changes to rectify the organization’s unsustainable financial model. Critics express concern that these measures could adversely affect service quality, particularly in rural areas.
During multiple town halls between March 14 and 15, 2025, constituents expressed concerns over potential cuts and administrative changes affecting Social Security benefits. In the Michigan session, Rep. Barrett addressed numerous inquiries regarding DOGE, emphasizing that its recommendations did not include Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid changes. Others shared worries over office closures and layoffs impacting access to benefits, with all discussions remaining factual.
Legal experts and Democratic leaders accused President Trump and Elon Musk of undermining the balance of power through DOGE’s aggressive cost-cutting measures, leading to multiple legal challenges. US District Judge Tanya Chutkan scheduled an unusual holiday court hearing on Presidents Day to address a case against DOGE.
Thirteen Democratic state attorneys general requested a restraining order to block DOGE from accessing information systems and placing federal employees on leave. They argued that Musk and DOGE exercised powers requiring Senate confirmation under the Appointments Clause. They also claimed DOGE lacked Congressional approval.
Elon Musk’s leadership at DOGE has intensely scrutinized his business dealings. Federal agencies, including the Department of Defense and NASA, have awarded billions of dollars in contracts to Musk’s companies, prompting concerns about impartiality.
Government watchdogs have called for greater transparency in the awarding of federal contracts. They argue that Musk’s dual role as a corporate CEO and government official creates an unavoidable conflict of interest. Lawmakers have proposed new legislation to prevent senior government officials from overseeing agencies that directly impact their private business interests.
DOGE’s approach to government reform sparks debate over efficiency, power, and accountability. Supporters argue it reduces waste, while critics warn it increases corporate influence in public policy.
Elon Musk’s leadership has added an unprecedented level of controversy. His direct influence over federal spending and his companies’ financial ties to the government have sparked concerns about corporate overreach. The legal battles and protests surrounding DOGE suggest that the agency’s actions will continue facing significant resistance.
The DOGE discussion highlights the challenge of balancing cost-cutting with transparency. Both sides continue to push their views as the impact of these changes unfolds.